Sunday, July 13, 2008

Obama and Blagojevich

Well, we know Axelrod was no fool.

Update: This pic's so popular, I started a caption contest.

Update: Dan Curry with a quote from David Wilhelm

Talk about poor judgement... from Ryan Lizza's Making it . On Obama's hand in giving Illinois the Blagojevich-Rezko regime.
That year, he gained his first high-level experience in a statewide campaign when he advised the victorious gubernatorial candidate Rod Blagojevich, another politician with a funny name and a message of reform. Rahm Emanuel, a congressman from Chicago and a friend of Obama’s, told me that he, Obama, David Wilhelm, who was Blagojevich’s campaign co-chair, and another Blagojevich aide were the top strategists of Blagojevich’s victory. He and Obama “participated in a small group that met weekly when Rod was running for governor,” Emanuel said. “We basically laid out the general election, Barack and I and these two.” A spokesman for Blagojevich confirmed Emanuel’s account, although David Wilhelm, who now works for Obama, said that Emanuel had overstated Obama’s role. “There was an advisory council that was inclusive of Rahm and Barack but not limited to them,” Wilhelm said, and he disputed the notion that Obama was “an architect or one of the principal strategists.”

David Axelrod, the preëminent strategist in the state, declined to work for Blagojevich. “He had been my client and I had a very good relationship with him, but I didn’t sign on to the governor’s race,” Axelrod said. “Obviously he won, but I had concerns about it. . . . I was concerned about whether he was ready for that. Not so much for the race but for governing. I was concerned about some of the folks—I was concerned about how the race was being approached.” Axelrod’s unease was warranted. Blagojevich and people close to him have been tied to a seemingly endless series of scandals. The trial of Tony Rezko revealed that Rezko used his influence in the Blagojevich administration to profit from companies seeking business with the state. There is speculation that Blagojevich will be the next governor to be indicted, and the Democratic Speaker of the Illinois House, Michael Madigan, has raised the issue of impeachment.
Update: Check Steve Diamond's review of Lizza over at The Real Barack Obama,
Of course, if Lizza put the Obama-Ayers relationship back as far as the 1987-88 ABCs days, that would contradict the line being put out by the Obama campaign and would open up another wound in the credibility of the Obama machine. At some point those add up, a turning point is reached and the magic wears off. That, surely, is something Lizza clearly and no doubt desperately wants to avoid.

The willful blindness of the liberal left to the origins of Barack Obama’s rise to power, including his close and long standing political relationship to Bill Ayers, is something we have not seen in this country since the run-up to the Iraq war. That war had Judith Miller, this year’s Presidential campaign has Ryan Lizza.
Lizza missed much including the whole Nadhmi Auchi connection too.

6 comments:

brianakira said...

So

a) Emmanuel boasted about his and Obama’s key role in getting Blago elected; and

b) Axelrod saw what a crook Blago is and Obama was at best blind as a bat.

Allen said...

Your website's been featured, via picture... http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1208/Blagojevich_questions_censored_on_Transition_site.html

It's hard to read, but it was clear enough for me to read.

Bill Baar said...

Thanks Allen...I've noticed!

Anonymous said...

This story reads like a novel where you get to finish the story. The most likely ending not to win the prize (the most implausible and therefore least creative) is the one where the guy (Axelrod) doesn't know what happened and is now looking back in retrospect saying, yeah, I didn't get involved in that (Blago's campaign) because it didn't seem like a good choice to me. Lizza is so gullible as are the rest of the media, to think these guys are going to tell the truth now.

Jack said...

The trio that Wolfram and Heart is too ethical to defend

Anonymous said...

I see no evil, I hear no evil, I do no evil.. so there!