As the world watches the North Korean missile site, one element is strangely absent from the debate. For the past 20 years, the notion of ballistic missile defense has been dismissed as fantasy by critics, mostly on the left. Now, as North Korea prepares to launch a missile capable of striking much of North America, the wisdom of Ronald Reagan's original vision has been finally affirmed. Mr. Reagan understood that rogue states with theater-range missiles in the 1980s could eventually attain ICBM technology. North Korea has reached that threshhold, and other pariah nations, including Iran and Syria, will gain that capability within the next decade. Critics still deride the notion of BMD, but as North Korea prepares to fire a long-range missile, we should ask ourselves: are we better off with at least a limited defensive capability, or no defenses at all. If the liberals had carried the debate, our defense against the TD-2 would (literally) be no defense at all.Or a devasting first-strike. That's really the liberals only alternative here. It's why I've written Kerry's doctrine of only fighting wars-of-last-resort means only waging wars of anniliation.
“Chicago is an October sort of city even in spring.” ― Nelson Algren, Chicago: City on the Make
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
North Korea's TD-2 launch
Spook86 writes the thoughts crossing my mind today while reading the news,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment