I found it here via Drudge with this review in the Washington Post.
It's a study released yesterday William A. Galston and Elaine C. Kamarck
...the new study exposes several pervasive myths that are allowing Democrats to evade difficult truths about the electorate. The Politics of Polarization also reveals how Democrats have lost ground among key groups of voters, including married women and Catholics. And it uncovers a new phenomenon the authorsAnd here are the four myths crippling the Democratic party (among other devasting habits they've fallen prey too).
call "the great sorting-out," which explains how the extraordinary new levels of
partisanship have polarized the electorate to the detriment of Democrats.
The myth of mobilization is the belief that the key to Democratic victory is to energize the base and bring them to the polls in record numbers.Their conclusion:
The myth of demography is the view that long-term, ongoing changes in the U.S. population - such as an increase in the number of Hispanic voters and female professionals - will secure a Democratic majority for decades to come.
The myth of language holds that the problem with the Democratic Party is not what it advocates, but rather how it speaks.
The myth of prescription drugs is shorthand for the theory that the Party can win national elections by avoiding cultural issues, downplaying national security, and changing the subject to domestic issues such as health care, education, and job security in the post-9/11 world.
The Politics of Polarization concludes by urging Democrats to confront the current myths of the party, stop hiding behind domestic policy and honestly confront national security, show tolerance and common sense on hot-button social issues, develop new economic policies that embrace global competition while establishing a modernized social safety net, and pay more attention to the very personal qualities of integrity and character that often win or lose elections.
It will be tough to recommendation to implement if the party doesn't deal with what I fear will be the ongoing revelation of gross behavior by a man I sadly voted for twice.
In another revelation, Freeh says the former president let down the American people and the families of victims of the Khobar Towers terror attack in Saudi Arabia. After promising to bring to justice those responsible for the bombing that killed 19 and injured hundreds, Freeh says Clinton refused to personally ask Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to allow the FBI to question bombing suspects the kingdom had in custody – the only way the bureau could secure the interviews, according to Freeh. Freeh writes in the book, “Bill Clinton raised the subject only to tell the crown prince that he understood the Saudis’ reluctance to cooperate and then he hit Abdullah up for a contribution to the Clinton Presidential Library.” Says Freeh, “That’s a fact that I am reporting.”Tragically sad because Clinton understands the sorting going on but he just didn't have the character to lead.
Good luck Hillary.